ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Reliable Bayesian Network Structure Learning in Biomedical Applications: Model Uncertainty Criterion and Its Operating Characteristics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Bayesian network (BN) modeling and computational systems biology have a long history of productive synergy. Learning BN structure from multiscale biomedical data is a central problem in this context. Computational methods for model reconstruction inherit the limitations of the underlying model selection criteria. As a result, the quantification of model features, structural consistency, and interpretability can suffer, making data-driven BNs context-dependent, unstable, and not directly portable across studies. Some of these concerns have been addressed by the introduction of the Minimum model Uncertainty (MU) principle and the corresponding MU scoring criterion. This work develops and refines the MU criterion, comprehensively assessing its operating characteristics in comparison with conventional scoring criteria to ensure its wide applicability across diverse biomedical research scenarios. Methods: The MU criterion is derived under broad network neighborhood considerations. Quality is assessed using misclassification error estimates. To enable this, we construct a dedicated statistical relationship model. We validate the findings numerically and demonstrate performance gains on real biomedical data. Results: The refined MU criterion is robust across a wide range of parameters and consistently outperforms the other scoring criteria considered, mitigating the sensitivity degradation seen with conventional scores, improving result consistency and generalizability, and delivering the interpretability needed for cross-application use. The accompanying statistical model further enhances interpretability by enabling accuracy/power estimates for individual dependencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.