ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Analyzing long-read CRISPR experiments with CRISPRLungo.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read sequencing can characterize complex genome editing-induced DNA sequence changes such as large deletions, insertions, and inversions that are difficult to detect using short-read sequencing. However, PCR amplification and sequencing errors complicate accurate variant detection, and existing analysis tools are not optimized for gene editing specific allelic outcomes. Here we present CRISPRLungo, a computational pipeline specifically designed for long-read amplicon sequencing of gene edited samples. CRISPRLungo incorporates unique molecular identifier (UMI)-based error correction and statistical filtering to distinguish true editing events from background noise, enabling robust detection of small indels and structural variants. Through systematic benchmarking using simulated datasets, we demonstrate that CRISPRLungo outperforms existing approaches in both accuracy and read recovery. CRISPRLungo supports both Oxford Nanopore and PacBio platforms and identify previously undetected structural variant edits such as inversions in published CRISPR datasets. To demonstrate allele-specific edit quantification, we applied CRISPRLungo to analyze edited primary cells from a patient with harboring compound heterozygous
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.