ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Biased inter-columnar communication and short-term plasticity in mouse barrel cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The barrel cortex (BC) processes complex direction-, frequency-, and phase-dependent input from whiskers to analyze objects in the immediate environment. Little is known about how BC microcircuits process this information and integrate input from multiple whiskers. To investigate these circuits we targeted a hybrid voltage sensor (hVOS) to Scnn1a excitatory neurons in cortical layer 4 (L4), and imaged population responses to electrical stimulation. BC in coronal and sagittal slices presented the laminar structure of the cortex with barrels aligned along stereotyped whisking directions. Voltage imaging tracked activity along an L4→L2/3→L4 relay during inter-barrel communication. AMPA receptor blockade demonstrated that this relay depends on excitatory synaptic transmission, and revealed intra- and inter-barrel feedforward inhibition. Communication between barrels was isotropic in response amplitude, half-width, and conduction velocity, but latency was longer for communication to caudal barrels. Furthermore, paired-pulse depression was weakest and recovery slowest for protraction-related directions, especially to caudally adjacent barrels. Such biases will preferentially enhance repetitive inputs in this direction. These results identify direction-dependent synaptic circuitry that shapes inter-barrel communication. Anisotropy in short-term plasticity aligns with whisker motion kinematics, suggesting that BC microcircuits are tuned to preserve temporal fidelity and selectively filter inputs according to whisking phase and direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.