ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Similar processing of novelty in rat dorsal and intermediate CA1 despite differences in spatial tuning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elucidating the fundamental neural mechanisms of hippocampal information processing is necessary for understanding memory formation and related brain disorders. Differences in hippocampal genetics, anatomy, and connectivity across the longitudinal axis suggest functional heterogeneity in this structure. The dorsal pole is suggested to be primarily involved in spatial processing, whereas the ventral pole is implicated in emotional processing. Connectivity and genetic studies show this functional segregation is more prominent near their respective poles and weaker toward the intermediate region. The current study compares the firing properties of CA1 cells in the dorsal and intermediate regions of the hippocampus during spatial or social/odor novelty. We measured basic spatial properties, firing rate response, and remapping to the spatial re-configuration of a linear track or the social/odor presentation of a novel male conspecific, female bedding, or coyote urine. Behaviorally, the average rat exhibited slower maze running latencies during the novel spatial manipulation and spent more time adjacent to the chamber containing the novel social/odor stimulus. As previously shown, dorsal cells had fewer, smaller place fields, and higher spatial information content than intermediate cells in the hippocampus. Despite the differences in place field characteristics, cells in both regions responded similarly to spatial and social/odor manipulations. Taken together, these data support the differentiation of some functions, together with an overlap of other functions progressing along the longitudinal axis, which may facilitate the integration of information throughout the hippocampus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.