Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41279705›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

An anatomical substrate of credit assignment in reinforcement learning.

J Kornfeld, Y Wang, M Januszewski, A Rother, P Schubert, M Goldman, V Jain, W Denk, M S Fee

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J KornfeldMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2547-8700
Y WangCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
M JanuszewskiGoogle Research, Zurich, Switzerland.
A RotherMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany.
P SchubertMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1265-3028
M GoldmanCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
V JainGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.
W DenkMax Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Martinsried, Germany.
M S FeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

From Electron Microscopy to Neural Circuit Hypotheses: Bridging the GapRF1MH117809 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEE, MICHALE S · 2018 to 2018
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH117809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key problem in learning is credit assignment. Biological systems lack a plausible mechanism to implement the backpropagation approach, a method that underlies much of the dramatic progress in artificial intelligence. Here, we use automated connectomic analysis to show that the synaptic architecture of songbird basal ganglia (Area X) supports local credit assignment using a variant of a node perturbation algorithm proposed in a model of reinforcement learning. Using two volume electron microscopy (vEM) datasets, we find that key predictions of the model hold true: axons that encode exploratory variability terminate predominantly on dendritic shafts, while axons that encode song timing (context) terminate predominantly on spines. Based on the detailed EM data, we then built a biophysical model of reinforcement learning that suggests that the synaptic dichotomy between variability and context encoding axons facilitates efficient learning. In combination, these findings provide strong evidence for a general, biologically plausible credit assignment model in vertebrate basal ganglia learning.

Identifiers

PMID41279705
PMCPMC12636467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.