Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41279603›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Quantifying the impact of genetic mutations on enhancer dynamics.

Maitreya Das, Deepro Banerjee, Ayaan Hossain, Matthew Jensen, Saie Mogre, Jiawan Sun, Joseph Mao, Adam B Glick, Howard M Salis, Santhosh Girirajan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maitreya DasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Deepro BanerjeeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0003-4877-0920
Ayaan HossainBioinformatics and Genomics Graduate program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Matthew JensenBioinformatics and Genomics Graduate program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Saie MogreDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Jiawan SunDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Joseph MaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Adam B GlickMolecular and Cellular Integrative Biosciences Graduate program, Pennsylvania State University Park, PA 16802.
Howard M SalisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Santhosh GirirajanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-4945

Funding

Genomic basis of phenotypic variability of genomic disordersR01GM121907 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI GIRIRAJAN, SANTHOSH · 2017 to 2025
$5.2M
Cellular Basis for Genetic Susceptibility to Neurodevelopmental DisordersR21NS122398 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI GIRIRAJAN, SANTHOSH · 2021 to 2021
$428k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121907NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS122398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional regulation is mediated by enhancers, yet how genetic perturbations alter enhancer activity and gene expression remains poorly understood. We developed UDI-UMI-STARR-seq, which integrates dual indexes and unique molecular identifiers, and combined it with RNA-seq to profile the effects of perturbations on enhancer activity and target gene expression. We applied this approach to a library of 253,632 fragments representing 46,142 cell type-specific candidate enhancers and assessed the impact of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of six transcription factors (or TFs; ATF2, CTCF, FOXA1, LEF1, TCF7L2, and SCRT1) with diverse regulatory roles. Across knockout lines, we identified responsive enhancers that were either repressed or induced, often through motifs such as the p53 family of TFs. Enhancer-gene mapping revealed TF-specific programs, including repression of Wnt/p53 targets with ATF2 or LEF1 loss, downregulation of the FIRRE locus with CTCF loss, and compensatory upregulation of RNA polymerase II regulators following FOXA1 depletion. A deep learning model trained on enhancer sequences recapitulated core principles of enhancer grammar, including cooperative motif syntax and the influence of flanking sequence context. Applying this framework to the neurodevelopmental disorder-associated 16p12.1 deletion identified responsive enhancers linked to genes involved in axon guidance, synaptic plasticity, and translational control, providing a scalable readout of enhancer dynamics generalizable to genetic mutations.

Identifiers

PMID41279603
PMCPMC12633387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.