ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The macrodomain of the Chikungunya virus NSP3 protein (ChikV Mac1) hydrolyzes mono-ADP ribose post-translational modifications on the human host proteins. Mutations in Mac1 reduce ChikV virulence. Thus, ChikV Mac1 is a viral drug target. While no potent ChikV Mac1 inhibitors are available, high-affinity inhibitors were developed for Mac1 in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here, we rationalize this difference in the ligand binding affinity in terms of three differences in the binding site structure and dynamics. First, the apo ChikV Mac1 binding site exhibits substantially more conformational heterogeneity than that of SARS-CoV-2, based on microsecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations; it also has a less druggable binding site, based on program SiteMap. Second, water binding sites overlapping with the ligand binding site in ChikV Mac1 are predicted by program WaterMap to have a stronger affinity for water molecules than the corresponding sites in SARS-CoV-2 Mac1, thus decreasing ligand binding affinity. Finally, a smaller number of Mac1 residues interacts persistently with ADP-ribose in holo ChikV Mac1 than in SARS-CoV-2. With these rationalizations in hand, we designed ligands of ChikV Mac1 using a fragment growth strategy; subsequent molecular dynamics simulations of a representative ligand in complex with ChikV Mac1 substantiated our design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.