ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Taming the reference genome jungle: the refget sequence collection standard.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reference genomes are foundational to genomics but suffer from widespread ambiguity and incompatibility due to inconsistent naming, undocumented differences, and lack of formal mechanisms for comparison. To address this, we introduce the GA4GH refget Sequence Collections (seqcol) standard. Refget seqcol is a framework for unambiguous representation, retrieval, and comparison of sequence collections such as reference genomes and transcriptomes. The seqcol standard comprises four components: a structured data schema, a canonical encoding algorithm that produces content-based, globally unique identifiers, a retrieval API, and a comparison protocol. This standard enables precise identification of sequence collections, even across decentralized or private systems, and allows compatibility assessments beyond exact identity, such as order-relaxed matches or shared coordinate systems. We applied the refget seqcol standard to 60 human and 36 mouse reference genomes sourced from major providers. Using digest-based comparisons, we quantified levels of similarity across attributes including sequence names, lengths, coordinate systems, and actual sequence content. Our analysis revealed some consistent subsets of sequences or coordinate systems, as well as substantial incompatibility among references and duplicate references under different names. To support adoption of refget seqcol, we provide a Python package implementing the full standard, a web API, and a comparison interface allowing users to assess local references against a curated database. This work offers a scalable, reproducible solution to the reference genome compatibility crisis, enabling improved transparency, reuse, and integration in genomic analyses. Refget seqcol enhances interoperability across tools and datasets, making genomic research more robust and reproducible.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.