ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Neurophysiology of mismatch negativity generation: a biophysical modeling study.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mismatch negativity, or MMN, is a ubiquitous evoked brain response elicited by any discriminable change of an otherwise regular stimulus sequence. Despite its potential clinical relevance - the MMN is known to be affected by brain state, lesions, and neurologic/psychiatric disorders - and a growing body of animal work, the underlying neurophysiology of the MMN is not well understood. This hinders translation of circuit-level animal findings and mitigates the utility of the MMN as a neurologic/psychiatric biomarker. Here, we used biophysical modeling to examine the neurophysiological basis of the MMN as measured in a canonical auditory oddball paradigm with frequency deviants (i.e., tones whose frequency was shifted slightly with respect to standard tones). The response to standards was successfully modeled by a typical feedforward-followed-by-feedback input sequence. The response to deviants required additional, prolonged input to supragranular layers, consistent with input from the non-lemniscal thalamus. This additional input resulted in downward-going pyramidal-neuron currents in both layer 2/3 (via indirect somatic inhibition)
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.