ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Proactive adjustments to cued gait perturbations in people with and without chronic stroke.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Balance disturbances exist along a continuum from those that are fully unexpected to those that are predictable based on cues from the environment. When people experience predictable disturbances while walking, they may proactively adjust their gait to minimize losses of balance. However, one's ability to effectively implement these proactive control strategies may be impaired after a stroke due to a combination of motor and cognitive impairments that result from brain lesions. Here, we used explicit audiovisual cues to characterize the proactive and reactive control strategies implemented by people with and without stroke during unexpected versus expected gait perturbations. Following unexpected treadmill accelerations, both groups had smaller margins of stability on the recovery step than during unperturbed walking. When we provided audiovisual cues specifying the impending perturbation step, people without stroke performed less leg and joint work, especially at the ankle, during the cued perturbations and increased their subsequent margins of stability by approximately 3 cm on the recovery step. However, people post-stroke did not make these proactive adjustments. Instead, after any perturbation, they modified their stepping to maintain their center of mass position within their base of support, and this reactive strategy remained unchanged with audiovisual cues. Our findings suggest that people post-stroke rely on a general reactive control strategy rather than proactively modifying push-off work, even when given precise timing information about the impending gait perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.