ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Measuring Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Anatomically and Conductively Accurate Rat Head Phantoms.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of neuromodulation techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), are highly dependent on the geometry and conductivity of the stimulated target of the brain. Although anatomically accurate head models are routinely used for computational simulations of TMS-induced electric (E) felds, there is still a need for realistic phantoms that mimic the anatomy and electrical conductivity of the head. Here, we present a realistic rat brain phantom constructed using advanced 3-d printing technologies. Our phantom allows validation of TMS-induced E-fields using embedded mutually orthogonal triaxial dipole probes (TDP) that can measure induced E-fields along three axes. We tested the TDP probes in the constructed phantom using four TMS coils with different core materials and core geometry. These measurements were then compared to computational simulations using the finite element method (FEM). The rat brain phantoms had a conductivity of roughly 0.5 S/m, which was mimicked in the FEM simulations. When the measured induced e-fields in the phantoms were compared to the simulated results, the measured results were in the same expected range and fairly close to one another with an average error of 5.1%. The peak E-fields (measured vs. simulated) close to the surface of the grey matter were: permender v-tip core (115.3 V/m - 110V/m), permender flat tip core (91.9V/m - 85 V/m), AISI 1010 v-tip core (94.7 V/m - 100 V/m), and AISI 1010 flat-tip core (85.9 V/m - 84 V/m) respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.