ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Optimizing methods for virome analysis based on studies of a synthetic viral community.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of whole viral populations--the "virome"--are yielding exciting new insights into biological systems, but methods are still being optimized. Here we describe generation and use of a synthetic viral community to assess several technical challenges important in virome analysis. Our mock community was comprised of phages lambda, T4, M13, MS2, and phi6, together with adeno-associated virus (AAV), murine hepatitis virus (MHV), and vaccinia virus (VV). We spiked the mock community into different human sample types, including stool, saliva, oropharyngeal (OP) wash, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), then passed the samples through different virus enrichment protocols and analyzed by Illumina sequencing. Compared to direct metagenomic sequencing, VLP enrichment protocols greatly increased viral read yields from virus-rich samples such as from stool and saliva. Three VLP enrichment work flows were compared, and each was found to have strengths and weaknesses. Four methods for DNA amplification were compared, with three showing over-amplification of small circular ssDNA viruses, most notably GenomiPhi. Studies of viral particle stability in the presence of nuclease showed that most viral genomes were stable when protected in viral particles, but phage MS2 RNA was unexpectedly labile under some of the conditions tested. Comparison of Illumina 1000-cycle sequencing versus 300-cycle sequencing showed that longer reads supported generation of longer viral genome assemblies. Bacteriophage DNA can be modified by at least 12 different chemistries, raising the question of whether these modifications might block recovery in virome analytical protocols. We tested bacteriophage T4 DNA modified with glucosyl-hydroxymethylcytosine (ghmC) and hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC), and found that both were readily detected, though the recovery of ghmC-modified DNA was reduced. These studies together with published data help provide guidance for virome researchers optimizing analytical protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.