Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278775›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Reasoning with programs in replay.

Sebastijan Veselic, Nour Mohsen, Lennart Luettgau, Elena Gutierrez, Maria K Eckstein, Steven W Kennerley, Timothy E J Behrens, Timothy H Muller, Zeb Kurth-Nelson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sebastijan VeselicDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
Nour MohsenClinical and Movement Neurosciences, Department of Motor Neuroscience, UCL.
Lennart LuettgauMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, UCL.
Elena GutierrezDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
Maria K EcksteinGoogle DeepMind, University of Oxford.
Steven W KennerleyDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
Timothy E J BehrensWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford.
Timothy H MullerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford.
Zeb Kurth-NelsonMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, UCL.

Funding

The Neuronal Mechanisms Underlying Choice Behavior in the Frontal LobeF32MH081521 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KENNERLEY, STEVE WAYNE · 2007 to 2009
$130k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH081521Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reasoning flexibly composes known elements to solve novel problems. Recent theories suggest the brain uses the axis of time to compose elements for reasoning. In this view, elements are packaged into fast neural sequences, with each sequence exploring the implications of a different composition. Using magnetoencephalography, we tested this idea while participants mentally executed programs. Each program contained a set of steps linked to operations, the implications of which had to be computed. We found that behavioral performance scaled with program complexity, and by the end of execution, inferred program solutions were represented in prefrontal and parietal cortices. We identified a possible mechanism by which these solutions were computed. During reasoning, representations of steps in the program reactivated in fast sequences, consistent with sampling candidate partial solutions. Further evidence suggested these reactivations were accompanied by representations of their operations, and were followed by neural patterns reflecting their computed implications. Together, these results suggest replaying sequences supports program execution and reveal a highly organized temporal micro-architecture of reasoning.

Identifiers

PMID41278775
PMCPMC12632884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.