Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278753›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Rapid inversion of singleton distractor representations underlies learned attentional suppression.

Ziyao Zhang, Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ziyao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-9221
Jarrod A Lewis-PeacockDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-465X

Funding

Biasing the Forgetting of Visual MemoriesR01EY028746 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI LEWIS-PEACOCK, JARROD A · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In visually complex and dynamically changing environments, humans must often filter out salient but task-irrelevant stimuli. Prior work shows that with repeated exposure to color singleton distractors, individuals can learn to divert attention away from these salient items. However, the neural mechanisms supporting such attentional suppression remain unclear. The present study examined the temporal trajectories of singleton distractor representations during visual search to address this gap. Using multivariate pattern analyses of EEG data in human subjects (N = 40, 30 females, 10 males), we identified two clusters of decodable singleton distractor representations: an early cluster from 100-200 ms and a later cluster from 200-400 ms. Temporal generalization analyses showed that the later representations were inverted versions of the early ones. Importantly, stronger late, but not early representations, predicted faster search responses, suggesting that the later signals support distractor suppression. This representational inversion facilitates suppressing singleton distractors in the spatial priority map. Comparing decoding evidence across locations revealed that singleton distractor locations were suppressed relative to non-singleton distractors. Moreover, comparing the neural coding of locations revealed that the spatial organization in the singleton distractor neural space was inverted relative to that in the target neural space. Together, these findings reveal a rapid representational inversion underlying salient distractor suppression at the onset of visual search. This inversion of singleton distractor signals was likely driven by top-down control mechanisms that transform bottom-up saliency signals, producing an inverted arrangement of target and distractor information within a shared neural space.

Identifiers

PMID41278753
PMCPMC12632336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.