ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Rapid inversion of singleton distractor representations underlies learned attentional suppression.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In visually complex and dynamically changing environments, humans must often filter out salient but task-irrelevant stimuli. Prior work shows that with repeated exposure to color singleton distractors, individuals can learn to divert attention away from these salient items. However, the neural mechanisms supporting such attentional suppression remain unclear. The present study examined the temporal trajectories of singleton distractor representations during visual search to address this gap. Using multivariate pattern analyses of EEG data in human subjects (N = 40, 30 females, 10 males), we identified two clusters of decodable singleton distractor representations: an early cluster from 100-200 ms and a later cluster from 200-400 ms. Temporal generalization analyses showed that the later representations were inverted versions of the early ones. Importantly, stronger late, but not early representations, predicted faster search responses, suggesting that the later signals support distractor suppression. This representational inversion facilitates suppressing singleton distractors in the spatial priority map. Comparing decoding evidence across locations revealed that singleton distractor locations were suppressed relative to non-singleton distractors. Moreover, comparing the neural coding of locations revealed that the spatial organization in the singleton distractor neural space was inverted relative to that in the target neural space. Together, these findings reveal a rapid representational inversion underlying salient distractor suppression at the onset of visual search. This inversion of singleton distractor signals was likely driven by top-down control mechanisms that transform bottom-up saliency signals, producing an inverted arrangement of target and distractor information within a shared neural space.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.