ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Evolutionary discovery and characterization of fungal transcriptional activators using active learning.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological discovery and design are increasingly being guided by predictive models in place of costly experimentation. However, existing datasets are often biased by overrepresentation from model organisms, leading to failures in evolutionary studies of non-model species. We present a hybrid framework that leverages high-throughput molecular assays and active learning to quantify biological properties across evolutionary space. We focus on transcriptional activators, which contain activation domains (ADs) that promote gene expression. ADs are intrinsically disordered and poorly conserved, which limits their study using comparative genomics. Here, we developed ADhunter, a high-capacity regression model that outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms in identifying and quantifying the strength of transcriptional activators. Model uncertainty was used to guide evolutionary sampling across 7.8 million proteins from 2,400 fungal genomes. We functionally characterized 9,836 ADs from 1,071 fungal genomes, providing a 15.5-fold expansion in genome representation compared to existing datasets. Comprehensive sampling from non-model genomes improved model generalizability and provides the first functional annotation for 3,416 proteins from 670 non-model fungi. Model interpretability analysis aligns with the biophysical model of AD function and reveals novel, underrepresented protein codes, highlighting the importance of sampling from non-model organisms to build evolutionarily robust models for predicting biological properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.