ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Spatial accessibility for deploying mobile lung cancer screenings in a rural state using two-step floating catchment spatial analysis in Oklahoma, United States 2025.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Mobile screening units have reduced access barriers. To assess lung cancer screening spatial access, we utilized a two-step floating catchment analysis (2SFCA) and an enhanced two-step floating catchment analysis (E2SFCA) to identify areas for mobile screening deployment. Methods: A spatial analysis was conducted using 2019-2023 census block group population data (ages 50-80) and a validated list of 165 lung cancer screening facilities in Oklahoma collected between December 2024 - May 2025, United States. Block groups were categorized into four spatial access groups. Analyses incorporated rural-urban continuum area codes. The 2SFCA used 30-min drive-time catchments, while the E2SFCA applied gravity-weighted 10-, 20-, and 30-min catchments. Results: Across both methods, 41 % of eligible Oklahomans resided in low or no spatial access areas, covering over 60 % of the state's land. Small rural areas had the highest proportion of residents (up to 67 %) with limited or no spatial access. Urban areas showed better spatial access, but up to 19 % of eligible residents still lacked 30-min access. Conclusions: Large sections of Oklahoma, particularly rural, lack spatial access to lung cancer screening. The 2SFCA and E2SFCA methods effectively identified underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.