Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278600›Full record

ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2025

Haloperidol versus Ketamine for Managing Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sayyed Majid Sadrzadeh, Ala Montazeri, Behrang Rezvani Kakhki, Elnaz Vafadar Moradi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sayyed Majid SadrzadehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ala MontazeriStudent Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Behrang Rezvani KakhkiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Elnaz Vafadar MoradiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The primary outcome was the management of acute agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of adverse effects and the time to onset of the therapeutic effect. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted between March 2021 and March 2022. Participants were recruited from patients presenting with acute agitation who required pharmacological intervention at Emam Reza and Shahid Hasheminejad hospitals (Mashhad, Iran). Eligible participants were adults aged 18 to 65 years. Using a block randomization method with a block size of four, patients were assigned to receive either 5 mg of intravenous (IV) haloperidol or 2 mg/Kg of IV ketamine. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22). Results: A total of 120 participants were randomized. The majority were male, comprising 43 (73%) in the haloperidol group and 45 (75%) in the ketamine group. The mean age was 45.42±16.65 in the ketamine group and 48.28±16.75 years in the haloperidol group ( Conclusion: Ketamine demonstrated a faster onset of action in managing acute agitation than haloperidol. These findings suggested that ketamine might represent a viable first-line therapeutic option for acutely agitated patients, particularly in clinical scenarios where rapid symptom control is critical.

Indexed as

Emergence deliriumEmergencyHaloperidolKetaminePsychomotor agitation

Identifiers

PMID41278600
PMCPMC12635519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.