ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Adaptation and validation of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) for tertiary physical education contexts in China.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Improving the quality of physical education (PE) is vital for countering global physical inactivity and establishing lifelong active lifestyles. Research indicates that students' approaches to learning (SAL) are a key determinant of educational quality. However, a validated, psychometrically sound instrument to measure these approaches specifically within the unique context of non-PE tertiary students is currently lacking. Purpose: This study aimed to validate the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F), an instrument developed by Biggs and widely utilized across various academic disciplines to measure tertiary students' learning approaches, within the specific context of physical education (PE). Methods: Data were collected from 492 Chinese undergraduates spanning multiple academic fields. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed on six competing models using two estimators, WLSMV and MLMV. Results and discussion: Results indicated that a first-order two-factor model comprising ten items measuring the deep approach (DA) subscale and eight items measuring the surface approach (SA) subscale exhibited good fit to the data. Reliability analyses further confirmed strong internal consistency, with coefficients of 0.947 for the overall structural model, 0.928 for the DA subscale, and 0.855 for the SA subscale. These findings provided evidence that the adapted 18-item R-SPQ-2F was a valid and reliable tool for measuring Chinese undergraduates' learning approaches in PE contexts. By establishing a valid measure of PE learning approaches, this study provided a foundation for designing targeted interventions that bridge the improvement of PE learning approaches with active lifestyle promotion. Future validation in diverse PE settings and student populations is recommended to strengthen its utility for such health-promotion initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.