ArticleBritish journal of biomedical science2025
Reproducibility of Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Receptors, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) and Ki-67 in Vietnam.
Article in British journal of biomedical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive elevation of MnSOD and GPX4 expression across the spectrum of pulmonary adenocarcinoma lesions: a digital pathology study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Post-Surgical Reassessment of Breast Cancer IHC: Concordance, Δ-Metrics, and Treatment-Relevant Reclassification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Immunohistochemical (IHC) testing of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), HER2 and Ki-67 on breast cancer samples is carried out in the majority of clinical departments to predict response to therapies and to determine prognosis. Issues surrounding the reproducibility of testing are well documented and guidelines recommend laboratories participate in external quality assessment (EQA) in order to ensure reliability of results. Objective: To assess the reproducibility of IHC testing for these markers in hospitals from the south, north, and centre of Vietnam, estimated to be approximately half of all clinical hospitals in the country performing these tests. Design: As cases are referred for testing between hospitals, an EQA ring study was designed that included the testing of samples from all participating laboratories. Participants were provided with unstained slides of invasive breast carcinomas with different expression levels for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67. Results: There was a significant level of reproducibility for all four biomarkers, with ER testing giving the least variation in results (kappa 0.822, coefficient of variation [CV] 4.8%) and Ki-67 the greatest variation (kappa 0.647 CV 17%). However, 328/392 (84%) and 317/392 (81%) of the Ki-67 evaluations were in agreement when employing the clinically relevant cut points of ≥30% and ≥20%, respectively. The reproducibility of testing for HER2-low expression was relatively poor (kappa 0.323, 95% CI 0.223-0.424), compared to overall agreement for HER2 testing (kappa 0.794, 95% CI 0.753-0.836). Conclusion: This is the first EQA ring study held within Vietnam for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 and sets the base line as to the current level of reproducibility in the country. Continued participation in the program will help ensure the reliability of testing for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.