Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278571›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of biomedical science2025

Reproducibility of Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen Receptors, Progesterone Receptors, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) and Ki-67 in Vietnam.

Thai Anh Tu, Nguyen Van Tin, Anthony Rhodes, Dinh Bui Quynh Anh, Le Thi Hong Dao, Nguyen Thi Truc Linh, Dinh Thi Khanh Nhu, Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung, Lam Thanh Cam, Ngo Thi Minh Hanh and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of biomedical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Thai Anh TuDepartment of Pathology, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Van TinBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Anthony RhodesInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Dinh Bui Quynh AnhBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Le Thi Hong DaoBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Truc LinhBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Dinh Thi Khanh NhuBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Hong NhungBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Lam Thanh CamDepartment of Pathology, Ca Mau General Hospital, Ca Mau, Vietnam.
Ngo Thi Minh HanhDepartment of Pathology, 108 Military Central Hospital, Ha Noi, Vietnam.
Pham Nguyen CuongDepartment of Pathology, Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thanh ToanDepartment of Pathology, Military Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Khac TuyenDepartment of Pathology, Military Hospital 175, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Do Dinh KhanhDepartment of Pathology, Nhan dan Gia Dinh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tran Thi Truc NganDepartment of Pathology, Can Tho Oncology Hospital, Can Tho, Vietnam.
Lam Kieu Mong ThyDepartment of Pathology, Tu Du Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Van ThanhDepartment of Pathology, Da Nang Oncology Hospital, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Nguyen Quang TuanDepartment of Pathology, Da Nang Hospital for Women and Children, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Vo Ngoc NguyenBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Le Thi Thuy NhuBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Dam Chau BaoBureau of Accreditation Vietnam, Center for Standardization and Quality Control in Medical Laboratory of Ho Chi Minh City (CSQL), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: Immunohistochemical (IHC) testing of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), HER2 and Ki-67 on breast cancer samples is carried out in the majority of clinical departments to predict response to therapies and to determine prognosis. Issues surrounding the reproducibility of testing are well documented and guidelines recommend laboratories participate in external quality assessment (EQA) in order to ensure reliability of results. Objective: To assess the reproducibility of IHC testing for these markers in hospitals from the south, north, and centre of Vietnam, estimated to be approximately half of all clinical hospitals in the country performing these tests. Design: As cases are referred for testing between hospitals, an EQA ring study was designed that included the testing of samples from all participating laboratories. Participants were provided with unstained slides of invasive breast carcinomas with different expression levels for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67. Results: There was a significant level of reproducibility for all four biomarkers, with ER testing giving the least variation in results (kappa 0.822, coefficient of variation [CV] 4.8%) and Ki-67 the greatest variation (kappa 0.647 CV 17%). However, 328/392 (84%) and 317/392 (81%) of the Ki-67 evaluations were in agreement when employing the clinically relevant cut points of ≥30% and ≥20%, respectively. The reproducibility of testing for HER2-low expression was relatively poor (kappa 0.323, 95% CI 0.223-0.424), compared to overall agreement for HER2 testing (kappa 0.794, 95% CI 0.753-0.836). Conclusion: This is the first EQA ring study held within Vietnam for ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67 and sets the base line as to the current level of reproducibility in the country. Continued participation in the program will help ensure the reliability of testing for clinical use.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsVietnamBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesteronebreast cancerERHER2Ki67PR

Identifiers

PMID41278571
PMCPMC12636235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.