ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2025
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Versus Fresh Frozen Plasma in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The thrombelastometry parameter CTEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Excessive bleeding and coagulopathy frequently occur after cardiac surgery, and Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) remains the standard treatment. Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCC) present a potential alternative; however, their effectiveness and safety compared to FFP remain uncertain. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect, were searched from inception till April 2025. The risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were pooled using the random-effects model in Review Manager software for the dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and GRADE assessment were performed to evaluate the cause of heterogeneity and assess the certainty of evidence, respectively. Publication bias was evaluated visually through funnel plots and statistically through Egger's regression test. Results: This meta-analysis included 9 studies-comprising 4 randomized controlled trials and 5 observational studies-covering a total of 1920 patients. PCC is associated with a significant reduction in chest tube drainage output within 24 hours compared to FFP (MD -170.05, 95% CI, -253.54 to -86.56; Conclusion: PCC significantly reduced the chest tube drainage output along with the number of RBC units transfused and the number of patients requiring RBC transfusion within the first 24 hours. In contrast, stroke, other thromboembolic events, and all-cause mortality were comparable between the 2 groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.