Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278546›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2025

Are Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids Affordable, Accessible, and Satisfactory? Insights from MarkeTrak 25 Survey Data.

Erin M Picou, Haiping Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erin M PicouDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Haiping HuangDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review the current state of the over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aid market, specifically focusing on adoption, affordability, accessibility, and satisfaction rates in the MarkeTrak 2025 survey. In a large-scale consumer survey, nearly 5,000 adults with perceived hearing difficulties completed a survey, which asked questions about, among other things, their hearing aids. The results of the survey suggest OTC hearing aids have had a small incremental increase (4 percentage points) in hearing device adoptions, a smaller impact than earbuds with features designed to support hearing loss. The introduction of OTC hearing aids has not affected the adoption rates of prescription hearing aids, where adoption rates (currently 39%) have been stable, or even increased, over the last decade. The data also demonstrate that most OTC hearing aid owners received some professional services, suggesting the accessibility of OTC hearing aids might not be fully successful if success means the ability to acquire hearing aids without professional support. However, OTC hearing aids have been successful in other respects. Relative to prescription hearing aids, OTC hearing aids are more affordable and have similarly high satisfaction rates. The OTC and earbud devices will be interesting to continue to monitor as the market adjusts to the widespread availability of direct-to-consumer solutions for management of hearing difficulties in adults. To date, the availability of OTC hearing aids has not disrupted the prescription hearing aid market, although they are more affordable, and most people who use them are satisfied.

Indexed as

accessibilityaffordabilityhearing aidOTCsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41278546
PMCPMC12638185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.