Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278543›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2025

Hearing Aid Adoption in the OTC Hearing Aid Era: Market Trends and Consumer Insights from MarkeTrak 2025.

Anna Marie Jilla, Lindsey Jorgensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna Marie JillaDepartment of Communicative Disorders, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana.
Lindsey JorgensenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2025 iteration of the MarkeTrak survey offers a comprehensive analysis of hearing aid adoption trends in the United States, with a particular focus on the impact of over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids introduced in 2022. This study explores evolving consumer behaviors, demographic shifts, and clinical and psychosocial factors influencing hearing aid uptake. Findings reveal a continued increase in overall adoption rates, with OTC devices serving as a critical access point for first-time users-particularly younger, more diverse, and cost-sensitive populations. Despite the affordability and accessibility of OTC devices, traditional hearing aids remain the preferred choice among individuals with more severe hearing loss and those seeking professional support. The report highlights key differences in service delivery, satisfaction, and repurchase intentions between user groups, underscoring the enduring value of professional care. Additionally, the emergence of hearing improvement features in consumer electronics, such as earbuds, signals a broadening of the hearing device landscape. These insights have significant implications for clinical practice, marketing strategies, and policy development, emphasizing the need for flexible, patient-centered care models that accommodate diverse consumer pathways and preferences.

Indexed as

consumer satisfactionhearing aidsOTC

Identifiers

PMID41278543
PMCPMC12638189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.