ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Factors influencing Vizient length of stay index after surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF).
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Length of stay: the outcome metric that has long overstayed its value.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical stabilization of ribs (SSRF) has been associated with shorter durations of mechanical ventilation and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay (LOS). Vizient is a national organization that provides detailed quality data, including the LOS index, benchmarked to comparable-sized and acuity health systems. Aims: Identify factors associated with shorter and expected LOS index among patients undergoing SSRF. Method: We performed a retrospective review of all adult trauma patients who underwent SSRF from November 2021 to May 2023 at our American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center. Logistic regression on key patient characteristics was performed to assess associations with LOS index <1. Results: 37 (69%) patients had an LOS index <1, whereas 17 (32%) had an expected LOS index >1. Patients with a LOS index <1 had lower injury severity scores (ISS) (16.9 SD=11.2 vs 21.7 SD=10.5, p=0.029) and were more commonly working full-time preinjury (n=16, 43%) compared with patients with a LOS index >1 (n=8, 47%, p=0.042). LOS index >1 was also associated with higher body mass index (BMI), government insurance, and polytrauma. Conclusion: Focused, early interventions in patients with higher BMI, polytrauma, and higher ISS scores may help lower the LOS index among patients undergoing SSRF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.