ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Towards clinical implementation of T2-weighted cine imaging for intrafraction drift correction workflows on the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-linear accelerator.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: In magnetic resonance-linear accelerator (MR-Linac) treatments, balanced Turbo Field Echo (bTFE) cine imaging is used to monitor and correct intrafraction motion but provides limited contrast and is prone to artifacts. This study evaluates a T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo (T2-TSE) cine sequence for intrafraction drift correction in pelvic targets and compares its performance with the bTFE-cine. Materials and methods: During 86 fractions in 52 patients with pelvic tumors, the standard bTFE-cine and the T2-TSE-cine images were acquired interleaved coronal and sagittal on the MR-Linac. Pre- and post-treatment T2-weighted 3D images were registered. Intrafraction motion, deviations between 3D-3D and 3D-2D registration, and jitter were compared. Visual grading scores and acoustic noise levels were assessed in both sequences. Results: The bTFE-cine shows in 26 cases > 1 mm between the 3D-3D and 3D-2D registration compared to 6 cases for the T2-TSE-cine in all directions, however these differences were not statistically significant. The jitter was higher for the bTFE-cine in prostate cases compared to T2-TSE-cine, but comparable or less for rectum and pelvic lymph node metastatic cases. The visual assessment indicates a high preference for the T2-TSE-cine regarding target, organs at risk (OAR) visualization and in terms of artifacts. The equivalent sound levels for the bTFE-cine and T2-TSE-cine were 110.7 and 100.1 dB(A), respectively. Conclusion: This study shows comparable tracking results, higher visual grading scores and lower acoustic noise levels of the T2-TSE-cine sequence over the bTFE-cine used for intrafraction drift correction workflows of pelvic targets on the MR-Linac.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.