ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Machine Learning Models Using General and Tissue-Specific Feature Extractors for Accurate Subtyping of Biopsy Samples: Advancing Lung Cancer Diagnosis in Latin America.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with accurate histologic subtype classification critical for diagnosis and treatment planning. Diagnostic variability and resource disparities, particularly in underrepresented regions such as Latin America, pose substantial challenges. This study developed and evaluated novel artificial intelligence models trained on both global and Latin American pathology samples for subtype classification of hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). Methods: Two DinoV2-based feature extractors, LungDino and OncoDino, trained on large data sets for task-specific and general pathology applications, were developed. The training data set consisted of 1308 HE-stained WSIs, including 412 adenocarcinomas, 323 squamous cell carcinomas, 41 small cell carcinomas, and 532 benign tissue samples, sourced from The Cancer Genome Atlas and an in-house Latin American data set. A ResNet model trained on ImageNet served as the baseline. Models were evaluated on 79 Latin American WSIs using receiver operating characteristic curves, and heatmaps were generated for tumor localization. Results: The DinoV2-based models outperformed the ResNet baseline. LungDino achieved the highest overall performance, with area under the curves of 0.97 for adenocarcinoma and 0.96 for squamous cell carcinoma. OncoDino excelled in underrepresented categories, achieving an area under the curve of 0.99 for small cell carcinoma, demonstrating its generalizability. Both models generated interpretable heatmaps, with LungDino demonstrating precise tumor localization. In the subset of samples classified as poorly differentiated or undifferentiated in HE pathology reports, the DinoV2 models also maintained high classification performance. Conclusion: These findings underscore the effectiveness of task-specific and general feature extractors in delivering accurate, explainable results and address a gap in artificial intelligence-driven histopathology advancements, paving the way for future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.