Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278389›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Assessing the Impact of a Preventive Care Bundle and Nursing Empowerment on Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Rates in Saudi Arabia: A Single-Arm Intervention Study.

Nahla Tayyib, Fatmah Alsolami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nahla TayyibFaculty of Nursing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-8293
Fatmah AlsolamiFaculty of Nursing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) remain a major healthcare-associated concern despite being largely preventable. They contribute to prolonged hospital stays, increased antimicrobial resistance, and higher healthcare costs. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured CAUTI prevention bundle combined with a nursing empowerment program in a tertiary care hospital in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. The objective was to update evidence-based practices, improve compliance with urinary catheter insertion and maintenance protocols, and enable nurses to independently discontinue catheters without a documented clinical indication. Methods: Conducted between October 2023 and May 2024, the prospective single-arm intervention included 247 adult patients requiring indwelling urinary catheters across medical, surgical, and neurosurgical wards. CAUTI rates were measured according to CDC/NHSN (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network) criteria, and bundle compliance was monitored using standardized audits. Results: The intervention led to a 73% reduction in CAUTI incidence, from 5.4 to 1.41 per 1,000 catheter-days. Nursing compliance improved markedly, rising from 56% to 93%, while catheter utilization remained stable. Additionally, the average catheter days per patient decreased by 41%. Conclusion: These findings highlight the critical impact of structured protocols and nursing empowerment on reducing infection rates and enhancing clinical efficiency. The results support broader implementation of similar strategies in alignment with Saudi Vision 2030's healthcare improvement goals.

Indexed as

care bundleCAUTIhealthcare-associated infectionsnursing empowermentpatient safetyprevention

Identifiers

PMID41278389
PMCPMC12639225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.