Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278388›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Implementing Peer Learning in Clinical Nursing Education: Addressing Challenges in High-Pressure Healthcare Systems-An Interview Study.

Ann-Sofie Källberg, Marie Elf, Ulrika Förberg, Ulrika Nelzén Sievertsson, Henrietta Forsman, Maria Svedbo-Engström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann-Sofie KällbergCaring Science, Dalarna University School of Health and Welfare, Falun, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-9768
Marie ElfCaring Science, Dalarna University School of Health and Welfare, Falun, Sweden.
Ulrika FörbergCaring Science, Dalarna University School of Health and Welfare, Falun, Sweden.
Ulrika Nelzén SievertssonCenter for Healthcare Education, Region Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Henrietta ForsmanCaring Science, Dalarna University School of Health and Welfare, Falun, Sweden.
Maria Svedbo-EngströmCaring Science, Dalarna University School of Health and Welfare, Falun, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-592X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peer learning is an educational strategy used in clinical training for nursing students that has proven to be beneficial for both students and supervisors. Objective: This study aimed to describe the perceptions and experiences of first-line managers, clinical supervisors, and educators in nursing with peer learning (PL) as a supervision model. It also aimed to describe the implementation process, focusing on key factors and obstacles to successful implementation in healthcare systems facing pressure from registered nurse (RN) shortages. Method: This qualitative descriptive interview study involved individual and focus group interviews with 20 participants from three groups: first-line managers, clinical supervisors, and educators in nursing. Interviews were analyzed using deductive content analysis, guided by the i-PARIHS framework. Results: While PL improved supervision quality, adaptability, and recruitment opportunities, it required active engagement from staff and students, and ongoing collaboration with the university. Experienced challenges were students with varying competence levels and inadequate continuity due to the shortage of RNs. Participants found the introductory activities and scheduled meetings valuable but faced challenges related to time allocation and a lack of RNs to act as clinical supervisors. Conclusion: Despite PL's benefits, the RN shortage hinders its implementation, necessitating the development of flexible models that can be implemented despite the shortage.

Indexed as

nursing educationnursing studentsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41278388
PMCPMC12638713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.