ReviewInternational journal of burns and trauma2025
Virtual reality-based functional recovery in burn population: a systematic review.
Review in International journal of burns and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effectiveness of innovative educational techniques based on the Transtheoretical Model on the self-care ability of patients with colorectal cancer undergoing ostomy: A randomized controlled trial.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality-based interventions in promoting functional recovery among individuals with burn injuries. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Ovid, CINAHL, PEDro, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library.
methodsMultiple data sources were explored from beginning to March 31, 2024, with study design of randomized clinical trials describing Range of Motion, enhanced ability for self-care (ADLs) and independence, quality of life in adult with burn injury. ROM was primarily measured using goniometers and electronic digital goniometers to assess the degrees of movement at affected joints before and after VR-based rehabilitation sessions. Two independent authors analyzed the results and selected the data. Cochrane Criteria Risk of Bias version 2 was used to measure risk of bias. Patient demographics, treatment regimen and outcome measuring tool, results and change in the patients' conditions were also extracted. Each study was appraised to check the level of evidence.
results8 publications were selected with a total of 293 patients included in these studies. Level of evidence analysis revealed that 8 studies were classified as level of evidence A2. The lowest PEDro score was 6 for one study only while other studies scored 7, 8, and 9 accordingly. In this review, seven studies were categorized as low risk of bias, while one study had some risk of bias. Our results showed that virtual reality can increase range of motion, enhanced ability for Self-Care (ADLs) and independence, improved quality of life in patients with burn injury, though strength of conclusion for mobility and ADLs was moderate.
conclusionPreliminary evidence indicates that virtual reality "V.R." interventions could be beneficial in promoting functional recovery in patients with burn injuries. The studies reviewed suggest Virtual Reality can reduce pain during rehabilitation, improve range of motion, and increase patient engagement. However, the limited number of studies and the variability in VR methods and outcome measures restrict the generalizability of these findings. Further rigorous research with standardized protocols is needed to validate these results and guide clinical practice. Future investigations should aim for larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of VR in burn rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.