Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Optimized prediction of breast cancer tumor microenvironment using MRI-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics: a prospective study.

Eun Sil Kim, Sungwon Ham, Bo Kyoung Seo, Ji Young Lee, Woong Sun, Minkyu Jeon, Minseok Joo, Seonghoon Park, Shuncong Wang, Boram Lee and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06095414 (Prospective Study of MRI-based Radiomics in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06095414 completednot on this map

Prospective Study of MRI-based Radiomics in Breast Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKorea University Ansan HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled121ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Eun Sil Kim *Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Sungwon Ham *Healthcare Readiness Institute for Unified Korea, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Bo Kyoung Seo *Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Ji Young Lee *Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Woong SunDepartment of Anatomy, Brain Korea 21 Plus Program for Biomedical Science, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minkyu JeonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Informatics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Minseok JooDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Informatics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seonghoon ParkDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Informatics, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shuncong WangDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Boram LeeDepartment of Anatomy, Brain Korea 21 Plus Program for Biomedical Science, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Yoon LeeDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Min Sun BaeDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Ran ChoDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ok Hee WooDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Eun SongDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Yeon KimDepartment of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The tumor microenvironment (TME), composed of non-tumor elements such as stromal matrix and immune cells, plays a critical role in tumor progression, metastasis, and treatment response. This study aimed to investigate the association between MRI-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features and the TME components, including extracellular matrix (ECM) and immune cells, in patients with invasive breast cancer. Methods: In this prospective study, 121 women with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer underwent pre-treatment multiparametric 3T breast MRI, including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences (NCT06095414, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov). The dataset was randomly divided into training and testing cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. A total of 16180 radiomic features were extracted from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions. Three-dimensional volume histology with quantitative immunohistochemical staining of ECM and immune cells served as the reference standard for TME assessment. Predictive models were developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model performance was compared between intratumoral-only and combined intratumoral-peritumoral features across five MRI sequences. Results: Models incorporating both intratumoral and peritumoral features significantly outperformed those using intratumoral features alone in predicting TME components (P < 0.01). Among the five sequences, initial and delayed postcontrast T1-weighted images yielded the highest AUCs. For ECM abundance, the AUCs (95% CI) were 0.82 (0.78-0.87) and 0.82 (0.78-0.88) on initial and delayed imaging, respectively. For immune cell abundance, the AUCs were 0.82 (0.77-0.87) and 0.83 (0.78-0.88). Most of the top predictive features were first-order and texture features associated with tissue heterogeneity. Combined models more accurately captured ECM-rich and immunosuppressive TME profiles, characterized by elevated regulatory T cells and reduced cytotoxic T cells, which were associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion: MRI-based radiomic features from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions are significantly associated with TME components in invasive breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences provided the most robust performance. These findings highlight the potential of MRI-based radiomics as a powerful noninvasive biomarker for characterizing the TME and informing personalized therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapy and ECM-targeted treatments.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancerextracellular matrix (ECM)immune infiltrationmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)peritumoral regionradiomicstumor microenvironment (TME)

Identifiers

PMID41278298
PMCPMC12631440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.