ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Expert-guided approaches to complementary interventions for common side effects of cancer therapies: a practice-based perspective from integrative oncology centers in Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in traditional Chinese medicine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, based on the theory of "Fuzheng Quxie" and "Hewei Jiangni".American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer patients commonly suffer from substantial side effects of oncological therapies. Therefore, the Oncology Working Group of the Competence Network for Integrative Medicine in Baden-Württemberg, Germany (KIM-BW) developed practice-oriented recommendations for the integrative treatment of chemotherapy-induced mucositis (CIM), nausea and vomiting (CINV), and cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Methods: Two expert groups of physicians and nurses developed therapeutic recommendations using an interdisciplinary expert consensus process oriented on a Delphi-methodology with a standardized scoring matrix, considering training, feasibility, time intensity, clinical effectiveness, contraindications, and interactions. The consensus process was complemented by a targeted, non-systematic literature search conducted across the AWMF S3 Guideline on Complementary Medicine in Oncology, the KOKON knowledge database, the Working Group on Integrative Care in Oncology, and PubMed/Medline. Results: The expert panel consisted of 21 professionals (14 physicians, 7 nurses), all conventionally trained with additional qualifications in integrative disciplines. We evaluated 83 interventions. Top recommendations were identified for each symptom. For CIM: sage tea mouth rinses, ice cubes, sea buckthorn oil mouth rinses, frozen pineapple cubes, and herbal oral balm. For CRF: movement therapy, yarrow liver compresses, viscum album therapy, sleep hygiene with regular circadian rhythms, and hydrotherapy. For CINV: acupressure, ginger, aromatherapy, bitter botanicals such as gentian root, and homeopathic preparation Conclusions: Integrative treatment recommendations developed by the KIM Oncology Working Group provide pragmatic, clinically grounded guidance for integrative management of common treatment-related symptoms in oncology. Prospective evaluation of safety, effectiveness, and implementation across settings is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.