ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Unveiling the traits of HER2-low breast cancer: a comparative analysis of IHC1+ vs IHC2+/ISH-negative subgroups - insights from a 3-year cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival disparities in HER2-low versus HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review of progression-free survival and overall survival.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinicopathological characteristics and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-low hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Half of all breast cancer (BC) cases fall into the HER2-low category, defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+ Objectives: This study aimed to compare demographic and clinicopathological differences between IHC1+ and IHC2+/ISH- subgroups and evaluate their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in a cohort of patients with HER2-low BC. Methods: All consecutive patients diagnosed with HER2-low invasive BC between 2018 and 2020 at our institution were included in this retrospective cohort study. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between IHC1+ and IHC2+/ISH- subgroups. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were assessed in patients undergoing NACT, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with pCR. Results: A total of 222 patients were included, evenly divided between IHC1+ (n=105, 47%) and IHC2+/ISH- (n=117, 53%) tumors, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Both subgroups predominantly comprised female patients (99% IHC1+ vs. 98% IHC2+/ISH-), postmenopausal (55% vs. 58%), with early-stage BC (94% vs. 98%) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors (90% vs. 90%). Around two-thirds had grade 2 tumors (63% vs. 64%), and the median Ki-67 index was 20% in both subgroups. Most BC were classified as luminal B-like (56% vs. 58%), followed by luminal A-like (35% vs. 34%), and TNBC (9% vs. 8%). Among the 43 patients with HER2-low BC who received NACT, 36% of IHC1+ patients achieved pCR, compared to only 5% in the IHC2+/ISH- subgroup (p = 0.021). Multivariable analysis revealed that IHC2+/ISH- status (vs. IHC1+) was significantly associated with lower odds of pCR (OR=0.07, 95% CI: 0.00-0.51, p = 0.025), while higher baseline Ki-67 and ER-negative status showed non-significant trends toward higher pCR rates after adjustment for other variables. Conclusion: Despite similar clinicopathological features, IHC2+/ISH- status was independently associated with lower pCR rates compared to IHC1+. These findings suggest that HER2-low subgroups may influence response to NACT and should be considered in multivariable prediction models, potentially informing stratified treatment approaches in the era of anti-HER2 ADCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.