ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Consensus on managing delayed methotrexate elimination in high-dose therapy: insights from the Middle East.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptance and perceived efficacy of intraoral versus extraoral photobiomodulation for oral mucositis prevention in pediatric patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Trial
- Methotrexate Toxicity in a Patient With Renal Failure Despite a Normal Methotrexate Concentration: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) therapy is a cornerstone in treating pediatric and adult cancers, namely, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and osteosarcoma, due to its capability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Despite its therapeutic benefits, HDMTX poses significant risks of delayed methotrexate elimination (DME) and associated toxicities such as acute kidney injury (AKI). These risks necessitate individualized dosing and preventive strategies, including hyperhydration, urine alkalinization, and leucovorin rescue. Methods: To address these challenges, a modified Delphi method with two rounds was used to develop consensus statements to guide clinicians in mitigating HDMTX-associated toxicities and optimizing management strategies. A panel of 13 experts from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, Oman, Jordan, and Egypt formulated 54 initial statements focusing on HDMTX regimens, risk factors, preventive care, and monitoring strategies. Results: Consensus (≥75%) was reached on 50 statements covering HDMTX regimens, preventive care, and toxicity management. Recommendations emphasized standardized methotrexate monitoring intervals, structured risk assessment for DME and AKI, supportive care measures (hyperhydration, urine alkalinization), pharmacokinetically adjusted leucovorin rescue, and the role of glucarpidase in severe toxicity or AKI. Conclusions: This consensus provides concrete clinical strategies for the safe and effective use of HDMTX, including structured risk stratification for DME, standardized monitoring intervals, pharmacokinetically guided leucovorin adjustments, and early glucarpidase intervention in patients with AKI or severe toxicity. These recommendations are particularly relevant for optimizing HDMTX administration in regions with limited access to advanced interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.