ArticleBMJ public health2025
Access to emergency care in primary healthcare system in Tanzania: a mixed-method community-based study in a resource-limited setting.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing sustainable emergency care systems in sub-saharan africa: milestones and lessons from 15 years of clinical and educational initiatives in Tanzania.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a village emergency care model: a pilot intervention in rural Tanzania.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Timely access to emergency care services (ECS) is vital for reducing morbidity and mortality from acute conditions. While global barriers to ECS are well documented, little attention has been paid to access within primary healthcare (PHC) in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed access to ECS at PHC in Tanzania, offering insights relevant to similar contexts. Methods: We conducted a community-based, mixed-methods study in December 2021 across four villages in three Tanzanian regions. A structured questionnaire based on WHO-ECS indicators was administered to 673 randomly selected community members, covering healthcare access, awareness and barriers. Additionally, 12 in-depth interviews were conducted with village leaders and healthcare providers, and 4 focus group discussions with village health committee members explored systemic issues. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. The primary outcome was the proportion accessing ECS, assessed across availability, acceptability, physical accessibility and affordability. Secondary outcomes included general healthcare access and perceived challenges, analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Results: Among 673 participants, median age was 43 years (IQR 31-55); 55% were female, 68% had primary education and 89% were self-employed, mostly subsistence farmers. While 91% sought healthcare, only 27% sought ECS; of those, 73% obtained it. Most found ECS available (79%), affordable (64%), acceptable (59%) and accessible (57%). Barriers included long travel distances (48%), long waiting times (74%), medication shortages (64%), poor customer service (56%) and inability to pay (56%). Qualitative data revealed systemic issues such as poor infrastructure, low trust in facilities and preference for traditional healers. Conclusion: Our findings underscore significant barriers to access to ECS at the PHC level. These barriers are systemic, infrastructural and sociocultural. Addressing them requires coordinated, multisectoral interventions involving policy makers, healthcare providers, decision-makers at national and local levels, and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.