Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278252›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

Access to emergency care in primary healthcare system in Tanzania: a mixed-method community-based study in a resource-limited setting.

Gimbo Hyuha, Manase Kilonzi, Nathanael Sirili, Notikela Nyamle, George Kiwango, Juma Athumani Mfinanga, Raya Mussa, Gasto Frumence, Hendry R Sawe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gimbo HyuhaEmergency Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-4386
Manase KilonziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Nathanael SiriliDepartment of Development Studies, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Notikela NyamleMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
George KiwangoDepartment of Physiology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Juma Athumani MfinangaEmergency Medicine, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Raya MussaEmergency Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Gasto FrumenceDepartment of Developmental Studies, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.
Hendry R SaweEmergency Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, United Republic of.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Timely access to emergency care services (ECS) is vital for reducing morbidity and mortality from acute conditions. While global barriers to ECS are well documented, little attention has been paid to access within primary healthcare (PHC) in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed access to ECS at PHC in Tanzania, offering insights relevant to similar contexts. Methods: We conducted a community-based, mixed-methods study in December 2021 across four villages in three Tanzanian regions. A structured questionnaire based on WHO-ECS indicators was administered to 673 randomly selected community members, covering healthcare access, awareness and barriers. Additionally, 12 in-depth interviews were conducted with village leaders and healthcare providers, and 4 focus group discussions with village health committee members explored systemic issues. Quantitative data were summarised using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. The primary outcome was the proportion accessing ECS, assessed across availability, acceptability, physical accessibility and affordability. Secondary outcomes included general healthcare access and perceived challenges, analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Results: Among 673 participants, median age was 43 years (IQR 31-55); 55% were female, 68% had primary education and 89% were self-employed, mostly subsistence farmers. While 91% sought healthcare, only 27% sought ECS; of those, 73% obtained it. Most found ECS available (79%), affordable (64%), acceptable (59%) and accessible (57%). Barriers included long travel distances (48%), long waiting times (74%), medication shortages (64%), poor customer service (56%) and inability to pay (56%). Qualitative data revealed systemic issues such as poor infrastructure, low trust in facilities and preference for traditional healers. Conclusion: Our findings underscore significant barriers to access to ECS at the PHC level. These barriers are systemic, infrastructural and sociocultural. Addressing them requires coordinated, multisectoral interventions involving policy makers, healthcare providers, decision-makers at national and local levels, and communities.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchEmergenciesHealth Services AccessibilityPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID41278252
PMCPMC12636875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.