ArticleBMJ public health2025
Occupation: a predisposing factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection among hospital employees? A single-centre retrospective cohort study conducted in Austria.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify occupational subpopulations at risk and predisposing factors for SARS-CoV-2 infections among hospital employees in a large tertiary hospital in Central Europe. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, the incidences of SARS-CoV-2 occurring between 2 November 2020 and 1 July 2022, among employees and in the general population, were determined based on real-world data. From the infected personnel, information on sex, age, occupation and vaccination status was obtained and analysed. Results: 3812 employees acquired SARS-CoV-2 at least once during the 607-day study period. Particularly high absolute and relative infection rates were noted in staff in operational roles, as demonstrated by 948 infected members or 62.1% of this particular occupational cohort, consisting of 1526 employees. Additionally, infections occurred early in the study period and repeated infections were frequently observed. The numbers of unvaccinated employees were higher and of fully vaccinated employees lower in this occupational group. Vaccinations were further initiated significantly later in the operational staff compared with other occupational groups. Notably, nursing staff and physicians working front line were less frequently tested SARS-CoV-2 positive with 862 out of 3252 (26.5%) and 668 out of 2617 (25.6%) employees, respectively. The weekly epidemic curve in the hospital employees paralleled the observed incidences in the general population, although the proportion of infected was lower in the hospital employees. Conclusions: The observed differences in incidences and vaccine acceptance between the individual occupational cohorts showed that providing customised information on disease prevention and vaccination benefits to distinct subgroups is pivotal for hospital management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.