ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia2025
[Anthropometric Analysis of Brazilian and Imported Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants in the Brazilian Population].
Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the anatomical conformity of 25 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants to the knee morphology of the Brazilian female and male population. Methods: We analyzed 500 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of knees from 250 women and 250 men. We collected data on anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) measurements of femurs, tibias, and implants to assess their morphological correspondence. Results: The mean AP versus ML divergence between joint morphologies and the implants was as follows: 4.48 mm for female femurs; 4.89 mm for male femurs; 3.63 mm for female tibias; and 6.11 mm for male tibias. The implants with the best AP versus ML adaptation were: Medacta Sphere for female femurs; Stryker Triathlon for male femurs; Smith & Nephew Legion for female tibias; and Zimmer Persona for male tibias. When comparing the best femoral and tibial implant ratios for female subjects, the United Orthopedic U2 presented the best statistical score, followed by the Aesculap Columbus and Smith &Nephew Legion implants. For male patients, the implants with the highest scores were the Zimmer Persona, the Microport Advance, and the Smith & Nephew Legion. The worst ratios were found in the Peter Brehm BPK-S for female individuals and the Orthovasive Indus for male subjects. Conclusion: The implants studied presented satisfactory results for bone coverage of the knees of Brazilian subjects of both genders undergoing TKA. However, we also found differences higher than 10 mm in most implants. This finding highlights that surgeons must carefully plan the TKA during implant selection. Imported implants proved to be more customizable than Brazilian ones in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.