Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278225›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2025

Predicting first-time anaphylaxis in the elderly using stacked machine learning and population registers.

Toni Mora, David Roche, Rosa Muñoz-Cano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toni MoraResearch Institute for Evaluation and Public Policies (IRAPP), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.
David RocheResearch Institute for Evaluation and Public Policies (IRAPP), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Rosa Muñoz-CanoAllergy Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that requires rapid identification and intervention. Predicting individuals at risk remains a clinical challenge due to its multifactorial nature and variable presentation. Objective: To develop and evaluate explainable machine learning models that predict the risk of anaphylaxis using routinely collected clinical data. Methods: We analysed a matched case-control dataset derived from anonymised electronic health records. After applying chi-squared-based feature selection, we trained multiple classification algorithms-including logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, XGBoost, and a stacking ensemble. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. SHAP values were used to assess model explainability. Results: The best-performing model achieved an AUC of 0.79, demonstrating high discrimination and balanced sensitivity/specificity. Key predictors included healthcare utilisation patterns, age, socioeconomic proxy (copayment level), and specific diagnostic codes related to allergic conditions. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of interpretable machine learning approaches to support the early identification of individuals at high risk of anaphylaxis. These tools can enhance clinical risk stratification and inform preventive strategies in routine practice.

Indexed as

administrative healthcare dataallergy risk stratificationanaphylaxis predictionartificial intelligenceelderly populationhealthcare utilisation patternsstacked machine learning model

Identifiers

PMID41278225
PMCPMC12631650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.