ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2025
[Screening for sexually transmitted infections in asymptomatic non-pregnant people in the most vulnerable populations: a quick scoping reviewDetección sistemática de infecciones de transmisión sexual en personas no embarazadas asintomáticas pertenecientes a grupos de población vulnerables: una revisión de alcance rápida].
Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To map and synthesize the available evidence on screening strategies for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in non-pregnant, asymptomatic people in the most vulnerable populations. Methods: This is a quick scoping review, based on the guidelines of the Results: Fifteen studies were included, among them clinical guidelines, observational studies, and systematic reviews, with a predominance of publications from the United States and Australia. The evidence indicates that regular screening for chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis B and C, and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is recommended in populations vulnerable to STIs, such as men who have sex with men, sex workers, people taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), people deprived of their liberty, and people living with HIV/AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). The frequency varies according to the risk profile and anatomical site. Strategies such as opt-out screening and the use of rapid tests at points of care were highlighted, although gaps remain in their large-scale implementation. Conclusion: Screening for STIs in asymptomatic and non-pregnant populations is a relevant public health strategy, especially in the most vulnerable population groups. The findings support the discussions needed to update national guidelines and formulate evidence-informed policies, underlining the need for integrated strategies to increase access to early diagnosis and overcome health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.