ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Molecular communication from bone to skeletal muscle: an overview.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosome-mediated muscle-bone crosstalk: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Exercise‑induced exosomal noncoding RNAs: Molecular signaling cascades in bone remodeling and translational applications in sports‑related bone injuries (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Piezo1 channel: structure, mechanogating mechanism, functions, diseases and therapeutic strategy.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- A Review of Rejuvenation Strategies Targeting Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Their Impact on Bone Health and Regeneration.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a robust logistic regression model for predicting osteoporosis in older people.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intricate interactions between bone and muscle are central to musculoskeletal health. It was historically assumed that bone and muscle interact through mechanical coupling, that is, skeletal muscles attach to bone and facilitate movement of the bone via muscular contraction. However, recent studies have recognized bone and muscle as endocrine organs, capable of producing and releasing osteokines and extracellular vesicles (EVs) that influence each other's functions, thereby introducing a novel concept known as "bone-muscle crosstalk". The influence of muscle on bone has been extensively studied, little has reported regarding the muscle regulation by bone. Emerging studies indicate that the transmission of signaling molecules from bone to muscle is partially mediated by hemichannels and gap junctions formed by connexin 43 (Cx43) in osteoblasts and osteocytes. This review aims to summarize the latest findings on bone-muscle crosstalk, with a particular emphasis on the roles of osteokines and EVs derived from bone. Furthermore, it highlights the channel functions of Cx43 in the release of secretory factors through this crosstalk mechanism. The continued research into bone-muscle crosstalk is expected to identify new therapeutic targets for the twin diseases of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.