ArticleCureus2025
3D Imaging Evaluation of Distal Reference Axes for Tibial Rotational Alignment in Medial-Type Knee Osteoarthritis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Precise tibial rotational alignment is essential for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While Akagi's line is established proximally, the optimal distal reference axis remains uncertain. Methods We analyzed 120 medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients (mean age 71.7 years) using three-dimensional computed tomography. The proximal anteroposterior (AP) axis (Akagi's line) was compared with three distal axes: ankle AP (d-AP1), talar AP (d-AP2), and second metatarsal bone axis (d-AP3). Associations with Kellgren-Lawrence grade and femorotibial angle were assessed. Results Mean deviations from the proximal axis were -17.55 ± 9.49° (d-AP1), -3.36 ± 10.13° (d-AP2), and -0.85 ± 11.18° (d-AP3). d-AP3 showed the closest alignment and was unaffected by OA severity, though with gender-related variation. d-AP1 rotated externally with increasing varus deformity. Conclusion The second metatarsal axis (d-AP3) provides the most reliable distal reference for tibial rotational alignment in TKA, particularly when proximal landmarks are inaccessible during minimally invasive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.