ReviewCureus2025
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Paediatric Pelvic-Ureteric Junction Obstruction.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) is one of the leading causes of renal impairment in the paediatric population. Over the past few decades, the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape in this field has evolved significantly. We conducted a comprehensive quantitative bibliometric analysis of research trends in PUJO over the last four decades. A total of 2019 articles published between 1985 and 2025 were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection and analysed using the Bibliometrix R package (version 4.3.2; K-Synth Srl, Naples, Italy) and VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands). The annual number of publications has increased steadily over the study period. The United States was the most productive country (n=574), while the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.