Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41278046›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Operating Theatre Readiness for Urological Emergencies: Challenges, Pitfalls, and a Practical Checklist for Urology On-Call Teams.

Stefanos Gkaliamoutsas, John Gibson, Vaibhav Modgil, Ian Pearce, Theodora Stasinou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanos GkaliamoutsasDepartment of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
John GibsonDepartment of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Vaibhav ModgilDepartment of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Ian PearceDepartment of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Theodora StasinouDepartment of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urological emergencies demand prompt, skilled intervention to avoid serious complications. However, when these emergencies arise unexpectedly during non-urological procedures, such as general surgical, obstetric, gynaecological, or emergency operations, delays caused by inadequate equipment availability, lack of staff familiarity, poor communication, and other human factors can compromise patient outcomes. Drawing from a real case of intra-operative bladder and ureteric injury during an open inguinal hernia repair, this technical report highlights recurrent system barriers to timely emergency urological care and outlines practical solutions. A structured checklist is proposed to support rapid preparedness in non-specialist theatres, improve team coordination, and reduce avoidable delays. While descriptive rather than data-driven, the report synthesises real-world challenges and offers an adaptable, practice-oriented framework that may strengthen preparedness for high-risk urological emergencies.

Indexed as

checklistemergency surgeryhuman factorsquality improvementtheatre preparednessurology

Identifiers

PMID41278046
PMCPMC12640225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.