ArticleCureus2025
Cervical Tuberculosis in the Postmenopausal Period: A Case of Mistaken Identity With Carcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female genital tuberculosis (FGTB) is an uncommon manifestation of extrapulmonary tuberculosis that can closely resemble gynaecological malignancies, often resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. While the fallopian tubes are the commonest organs to be affected, isolated cervical involvement is exceedingly rare. We report the case of a 60-year-old multiparous woman from a tuberculosis-endemic region in Sudan who presented with severe lower abdominal, pelvic, and perineal pain, along with odourless vaginal discharge persisting for four months. Her condition had rendered her bedridden. Clinical examination revealed a nodular cervix, initially suggestive of cervical cancer. However, histopathological analysis of cervical and endometrial biopsies confirmed caseating granulomas indicative of tuberculosis. The patient had no prior history of tuberculosis or malignancy and had never undergone cervical cancer screening. Imaging showed a uterocervical mass without signs of spinal or metastatic disease, and pulmonary tuberculosis was ruled out via chest X-ray and sputum analysis. She was treated with a standard six-month anti-tuberculosis regimen, resulting in significant clinical improvement and restored mobility. This case highlights the importance of considering cervical tuberculosis in the differential diagnosis of postmenopausal women presenting with pelvic symptoms in endemic areas. Early histological diagnosis and timely initiation of therapy are crucial for favourable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.