ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Increasing continuous positive airway pressure use rates in the delivery room for very preterm infants: a quality improvement initiative.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In spontaneously breathing preterm infants, less invasive strategies, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and less invasive surfactant administration, have been increasingly implemented to reduce lung injury. In 2018, our center initiated a noninvasive neonatal resuscitation protocol incorporating these approaches as quality improvement (QI) initiatives. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of this protocol by comparing respiratory outcomes before and after its implementation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 578 infants born at 25 + 0 to 29 + 6 weeks of gestation between 2014 and 2022 at Samsung Medical Center. Infants born in 2018 and those with severe congenital anomalies, delivery room deaths, or outborn status were excluded. The study population was divided into Period 1 (2014-2017, before noninvasive protocol implementation) and Period 2 (2019-2022, after protocol implementation) to assess the impact of QI initiatives on neonatal resuscitation practices. The year 2018 was excluded from the analysis as it represented a transitional period. We analyzed the rate of endotracheal intubation at birth and other respiratory outcomes, such as CPAP failure and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Results: The rate of initial intubation was significantly lower in Period 2 than in Period 1 [77.0% vs. 45.9%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.40; Conclusions: Our findings suggest that even in extremely preterm infants, a noninvasive resuscitation strategy is feasible, associated with reduced postnatal steroid use, and does not worsen major neonatal outcomes, supporting its use as a viable alternative for those who do not require immediate intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.