ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Comparison of three port placement strategies for robot-assisted laparoscopic lich-gregoir direct nipple ureteral extravesical reimplantation in pediatric primary obstructive megaureter: multi-ports, single-port-plus-one, single-port.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cosmetic outcomes of three robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for treating pediatric primary obstructive megaureter (POM): robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-ports (RLMG), robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port-plus-one (RLSPG), and robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port (RLSG). Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis included 30 pediatric POM patients (December 2022-December 2024) undergoing Da Vinci Xi robotic Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation. Patients were categorized into RLMG ( Results: There were no significant differences in baseline demographic characteristics. There were significant inter group differences in the distribution of surgical side ( Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric POM. The single-port approach achieves superior cosmesis, whereas the multi-ports technique affords the shortest operative time. The single-port-plus-one offers a balanced intermediate option, enabling surgeons to optimize outcomes based on patient and procedural needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.