ReviewACS environmental Au2025
Insights into Microbial Enzymatic Biodegradation of Plastics and Microplastics: Technological Updates.
Review in ACS environmental Au, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The plastisphere paradox: microplastics as engines of antimicrobial resistance and hosts for polymer degraders.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial resistomes in plastisphere-associated microbes over aged low-density polyethylene microplastics in the Haora River of Tripura, India.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Toxic effects of microplastics in aquatic environments and the pathways to sustainable management.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Review
- Advanced technologies for plastic waste recycling: examine recent developments in plastic waste recycling technologies.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The massive usage of synthetic plastics in modern life has led to plastic waste generation, and its accumulation is a key concern for the environment and human health. Therefore, plastic is a growing environmental burden because of its small size, stability, and high recalcitrance, needing urgent advancements in plastic waste management. Plastics combined with cocontaminants, i.e., heavy metals, pharmaceutical toxicants, and other plasticizers, can cause serious environmental issues. Hence, an efficient and scalable method based on enzymes and biotechnological approaches is required for sustainable microplastic degradation. The present review focuses on the advanced and emerging biotechnological approaches for plastic and microplastic degradation, i.e., genetic engineering and genome editing tools. The review also discusses the challenges encountered in degradation viz. the depolymerization rate of microplastics and the intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as degrees of crystallinity, chemical structure, functional group, and molecular weight. Furthermore, the insight in this study is useful to the researchers and scientific communities investigating plastic degradation. Thus, future research can be focused on microbial metabolites and improving catalytic efficiency with extrinsic conditions involved in these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.