Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277995›Full record

ArticleCognitive therapy and research2025

Cognitive Predictors of Internalizing Symptoms in Clinically Anxious Youth.

Dania Y Amarneh, Michael J Zvolensky, Eric A Storch, Andres G Viana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive therapy and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dania Y AmarnehUniversity of Houston, Houston, USA.
Michael J ZvolenskyUniversity of Houston, Houston, USA.
Eric A StorchBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Andres G VianaTexas A&M University, College Station, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Internalizing disorders are the most common psychiatric disorders in youth and are associated with a host of deleterious outcomes (e.g., self-harm, substance use, interpersonal difficulties), highlighting the critical need for identifying risk factors that confer risk for these disorders. The present study investigated the unique and shared roles of two prominent cognitive biases-anxiety sensitivity and interpretation biases-as predictors of internalizing symptom severity in clinically anxious youth, above and beyond the effects of negative emotionality and after accounting for sociodemographic covariates. Method: A diverse sample of clinically anxious youth ( Results: Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that both anxiety sensitivity ( Conclusion: Future research should examine whether targeting cognitive biases would be beneficial among temperamentally labile youth.

Indexed as

Anxiety sensitivityInternalizing symptomsInterpretation biasesNegative emotionalityTemperament

Identifiers

PMID41277995
PMCPMC12638344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.