ArticleMethodsX2025
Tooth-level detection and mapping of dental pathologies on panoramic radiographs using YOLOv11 and RT-DETR.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- YoLeTooth: A Unified Framework for Joint Tooth Segmentation and Periapical Lesion Detection in Panoramic Radiographs.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Identification of the Medial Lingual Foramen on CBCT: A Deep Learning Approach for Preoperative Implant Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes a reproducible method for automated tooth-level detection and mapping of dental pathologies on panoramic radiographs. The workflow integrates two deep learning stages: (1) segmentation of individual teeth and (2) detection and classification of dental lesions. Outputs are combined to assign pathologies to specific teeth, supporting comprehensive radiological assessment. The method was implemented and tested using two datasets: a collection of 1,628 panoramic radiographs annotated with 12 pathology categories, and the public Tufts Dental Database. Several model architectures were evaluated, including YOLOv11 and RT-DETR configurations. The influence of image formatting and preprocessing strategies on performance was also assessed. Results showed that RT-DETR-x achieved the highest mean average precision (mAP@50) for pathology detection, while YOLOv11x produced the most accurate tooth segmentation. The integrated system demonstrated high precision in linking lesions to the corresponding teeth. This method offers a practical framework for developing AI-assisted diagnostic tools in dentistry and can be adapted to other imaging datasets. • Development of a fully automated dental diagnostic tool that segments individual teeth and maps detected pathologies to their corresponding tooth • YOLOv11 and RT-DETR variants are extensively tested for segmentation and detection tasks • Preprocessing and image formatting strategies are systematically compared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.