ReviewIranian journal of public health2025
Effectiveness of eHealth on Human Immunodeficiency Viruses Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Key Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Iranian journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: eHealth has proven effective in changing health-related behaviors and overcoming barriers to HIV care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review the effect of eHealth on HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in international databases without Results: Twelve articles involving 3,578 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The findings showed that using websites had a positive effect on PrEP (RR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.30-2.79). Moreover, e-health interventions had the greatest effect on PrEP uptake among female sex workers (FSWs) (RR=2.27, 95% CI: 1.62-3.17). Furthermore, e-health demonstrated a notable effect on PrEP uptake (RR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.30-2.79), particularly in studies with follow-up less than six months (RR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.19-2.09). Additionally, studies conducted in the United States reported the most significant effect of e-health on PrEP (RR= 1.71, 95% CI: 1.38-2.11; I Conclusion: eHealth interventions have the potential to improve the effectiveness of PrEP among key populations. Integrating e-health interventions with comprehensive healthcare services and providing continuous support can improve PrEP uptake, adherence, and retention in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.