Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277909›Full record

ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2025

Chemotherapy response monitoring with DNA methylation-based ctDNA tumor fraction: Evidence from a real-world cohort of patients with advanced common solid malignancies.

Christian D Rolfo, Moh'd M Khushman, Alessandro Russo, Roberto Borea, Bernard Herrman, Jing Wang, Jiemin Liao, Carin R Espenschied, Sean Gordon, Katie Quinn and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. From Theory to Practice: Which Biomarkers Are Ready for Predicting Response in Advanced HCC?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Targeting tumor transition windows.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christian D RolfoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Moh'd M KhushmanWashington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Alessandro RussoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Roberto BoreaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Bernard HerrmanGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jing WangGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jiemin LiaoGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Carin R EspenschiedGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sean GordonGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Katie QuinnGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Kimberly C BanksGuardant Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Arielle J MedfordHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/objectives: Chemotherapy remains standard for many cancers, but challenges remain in evaluating clinical response to therapy. Epigenomic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) quantification is an emerging molecular approach to tumor response assessment. Here, we examine a tissue-free, methylation-based assay to demonstrate how changes in circulating tumor fraction (TF) associate with outcomes in a real-world advanced, pan-cancer cohort treated with chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients with advanced solid tumors treated with chemotherapy and serial ctDNA testing, both pre- and post-therapy initiation. Serial samples were analyzed with an analytically validated next-generation sequencing (NGS) methylation-based ctDNA assay. The primary outcome measured was real-world time to next treatment (rwTTNT) as a surrogate for progression free survival. Secondary outcomes included real-world overall survival (rwOS) and lead time from TF increase to rwTTNT event. Results: Among 278 eligible patients, decreasing TF was associated with improved rwTTNT (aHR 0.55 [95 % CI 0.39, 0.79] p = 0.001). Patients achieving a ≥98 % decrease at any timepoint had superior outcomes (rwTTNT aHR 0.40 [95 % CI 0.28, 0.56] p < 0.005; rwOS aHR 0.54 [95 % CI 0.38, 0.79] p < 0.005). Patients with continuous TF decrease had longer rwTTNT than those with initial decrease followed by increase (aHR 0.05 [CI 0.004-0.575] p = 0.016). Increasing TF was detected in 64 patients with a median lead time to rwTTNT of 2.27 months. Conclusions: On-treatment changes in methylation-based TF in chemotherapy-treated patients are associated with long-term outcomes. CtDNA monitoring offers an opportunity to rapidly evaluate therapy efficacy, potentially improving clinical decision-making regarding benefit vs toxicity and long-term patient outcomes.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyctDNAMethylationMolecular responseMonitoringOverall survivalTumor fraction

Identifiers

PMID41277909
PMCPMC12630033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.