Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41277751›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026

Free from conspiracies: The negative relationship between societal freedom and belief in generic and content-specific conspiracy theories.

Maciej Siemiątkowski, Theofilos Gkinopoulos, Michał Bilewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maciej SiemiątkowskiFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3183-7570
Theofilos GkinopoulosDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Nicosia Athens Campus, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-5272
Michał BilewiczFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-1691

Funding

National Science Center (NCN) DEC-2023/49/B/HS6/01428Strategic Programme Excellence Initiative at Jagiellonian University U1U/P02/NO/21.97
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through five studies, this research examined how objectively measured societal freedom and individual perceptions of it are related to reduced belief in conspiracy theories. Study 1 (N = 6353 participants from 36 countries) examined the negative relationship between societal freedom (as measured by the Human Freedom Index) and generic conspiracy beliefs. Study 2 (N = 44,458 participants from 52 countries) focused on interest group-related COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs- a measure not explicitly referring to government actors. Moving to the individual level, Study 3 (N = 278) examined relationships between perceived societal freedom and various conspiracy beliefs, while Study 4 (N = 246) experimentally tested whether manipulating perceptions of societal freedom affected belief in generic conspiracist beliefs as well as those related to vaccines and financial crises. Results indicated that both greater societal freedom and higher perceived societal freedom are associated with lower levels of conspiracy beliefs. In Study 5 (N = 592), we examined the psychological mechanisms mediating the relationship between perceived societal freedom and conspiracy beliefs and found the significant indirect effect via political anger. These findings contribute to a broader understanding of how macro-level conditions can be incorporated into efforts to reduce the prevalence of conspiracy theories.

Indexed as

COVID-19FreedomSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoliticsSARS-CoV-2Young Adultconspiracy theoriesfreedomlibertypolitical anger

Identifiers

PMID41277751
PMCPMC12641589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.